In some parts of the web right now some very bright people are making much ado about the Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web.
I was chatting with someone yesterday who is a proponent of some of these ideas & the “open social graph” thing — i.e. somehow export (or grab) your data off MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.
It’s all very well and nice in theory, but I am hard-pressed to find scenarios where this would actually benefit me all that much. Is it a case of the classic Solution in search of a Problem?
I try has hard as possible not to log into MySpace anymoere, maybe checking my account once every few months. I am on The Facebook and check it once every few days, though I don’t understand why people love messaging each other through a third-party app when they could email each other directly.
Vested Interests
Too many of the proponents of these “open source social graphs”, etc. have vested interests. Microsoft? Facebook competitors? Your startup that seeks to leverage Facebook’s user data? (they didn’t just grow it on trees, y’know — they got 25+ million people to add it)
Doomsday Scenario
If it was revealed that Facebook were in fact some sinister plot by the CIA to gather all of today’s youths social hookup information. (Skylar is hooking up with Alexis but she’s also two-timing him with Aiden)
There would be a big uproar and then a bunch of people might migrate to the newest coolest social network, until it was later revealed they ended up being just as evil too.
This is exactly the plot in Southpark’s Something Wall-Mart This Way Comes episode, well worth a looksy for all the Wal-Mart haters out there. It’s incredible how 100% right-on the Southpark creators are on so many targets they choose to lampoon.